Heidi Fleiss smiling on couchHeidi Fleiss smiling on couch

Interview with Randy Barbato

  • You have done films about Deep Throat, Tammy Faye Baker, Monica Lewinsky, Anna Nicole and now Heidi Fleiss. Is there a theme or a certain type of subject you are drawn to?

  • We are often attracted to people who we think we know -- people who are in the media spotlight in a way that you think you have seen everything you can see, and heard everything you can hear about them. But often it's those people who we know the least about.

  • How did you come to cover Heidi's story?

  • Really, the hook for this film was meant to be the building of her brothel in Crystal, Nevada. We were very interested just purely from a character study perspective and understanding a really interesting personality. But we also thought, "Oh, here is a great narrative arc." This film will start with the breaking of ground and hopefully it'll end with a ribbon cutting ceremony - and who knows, maybe even a big dance number with a bunch of male studs. Obviously it didn't end up that way...

  • Did you have any inklings or expectations of any of the other issues she faced when you were going in?

  • We knew we were dealing with someone who had been through rough times; who had survived a stint in prison; who had previously had issues with drug addiction. So we weren't completely na�ve; we knew we were dealing with someone complex. We did not expect to find someone who was going through as tough a time as she was when we were filming. That did take us by surprise and it had a huge impact on the film that we ultimately made.

  • Was there a certain point where you got worried you had to change the course of the story? How did that work?

  • The reality is, when you are making virtually any documentary film, you imagine it in your mind. At times, you even create an outline. You pre-produce in your mind what this film will be. And then you get the camera in your hand and you throw everything out. Sometimes you are able to keep some of the ideas intact. It changes with every project. With this film virtually every pre-conceived notion of what we thought this film should be, we had to throw out the window. The one thing I would say that this film still has...that inspired us to make the film at the beginning...is just an incredibly compelling character. She is smart, she is funny. She is a bit of all the things that we imagined. The only difference is that, while we were making this film, she was struggling with the disease of addiction.

    You know, people set out to make films about addiction on a regular basis. But to see someone talk about it in a sober way and then live her life in what might be perceived as a not-so-sober way...it's not fun when you are in the field making it, but it's pretty compelling to see.

  • Do you ever have conflicts when you are making your films about wanting to intervene with the subject's life?

  • Our style of filmmaking is that we try to immerse ourselves in the subject's world as much as possible. We try to experience and look at the world and take it in the way our subject is. A lot of times, that's great, it's fabulous; you are immersing yourself in some fabulous person's world. But if they are truly experiencing a difficult and challenging and at times dark time...then it becomes a whole other experience. There were incredible highs and incredible lows. And a lot of time waiting. We have spent a lot of time at the Days Inn in Pahrump, Nevada. And let me tell you, it's no Bellagio.

  • It seemed like Heidi cleaned up for that one more formal interview about 10 months into it. Were you involved in that decision, or in her trying to get sober at that point?

  • Look, we had a lot of soundbites and audio from Heidi that would tell the kind of story we needed to tell. But there is just no way that this film would connect to people without that kind of an interview. We needed that. We were at a point in the film where we were shut out of our subject's life; she refused to work with us. Sheila Nevins conducted that interview. In the film, you see a number of people that we witness come into her life and get shut out -- you see Michael get shut out. Literally, that was gonna happen - no matter what - from day one. So we were just waiting for that to happen to us, and eventually it did.

  • You use a lot of imagery in your filmmaking. When in the process do you decide on those elements, and how do you choose them?

  • Everything is inspired by the subject: All the images, everything. A lot of it we decide as we are putting the film together, as we are in the edit room, as we are listening to things she said. That's where it all comes from. Some of it is stuff that we already shot; some of it is stuff that we literally set up in shoots, like the birdcages. There were a lot of metaphors going on and a lot of possibilities of visual motif that we kept seeing -- like birds in cages and her in prison.

    If we had tried to write this story, no one would believe it. You know: a bedridden former Madam who collects exotic birds...who dies and leaves the birds to Heidi. Come on. And I remember the first day meeting Maryanne, and seeing the way Heidi looked at the birds, and I just thought "Oh my God, really, this is the story - and this is the film."

  • How would you describe your style or influences?

  • Our style is all about the subject. I think that we are versatile documentary filmmakers. We are not "old school," we are not "purists," we are not particularly objective. [LAUGHS] We make films that aim straight for the heart. We are all about trying to understand misunderstood people. The number one thing is just for us to listen. We listen to what people are saying. And we watch what they are doing. And everything we do is inspired by that. We are not precious about filming a prop or recreation. We are not precious about any of that because everything is inspired by trying to understand our subject; by their words; by what we are feeling; by just...trying to get into their head and their heart.

  • There's this idea with documentaries that they are "more balanced" or "objective" or "real" than fiction because they are true.

  • Here is the thing. Truth is stranger than fiction. And truth inspires all fiction. Everyone who wants to tell a story - every movie that's made, every book that's written, whether the story is based on truth or not, everyone is trying to recreate something real. Recreate a real emotion. Recreate a real feeling. Recreate a real character. In that sense, documentaries always have one-up on all those other forms, because you have the opportunity to get the real deal right there, right in front of your eyes. But sometimes people get it wrong, [LAUGHS] you know? Pointing the camera and just shooting it at something real does not make a great documentary.

    Photo credit: Noel Vasquez/WireImage.com