Director Chris Moukarbel Was Drawn to the Spectacle of Banksy
When did you first hear of Banksy?
I don't remember when exactly; I've always known about Banksy as a British street artist. I have an art background and went to art school; it might have been then that I got to know his work, but not nearly as intimately as I do now after having made this film.
Were you in New York in October 2013?
I wasn't in New York. I knew of Banksy's residency from the news, but I didn't really get the same full-throttle media explosion of being in town. [President of HBO Films] Sheila Nevins specifically approached me because she was inspired by what was going on with Banksy that month and wanted to represent it in a film. I had previously done a film that HBO had acquired called Me at the Zoo, which also used a lot of user-generated content from the web and told a story that already existed in a public space. It seemed like a good fit to apply that style to make this film.
How did you go about harvesting material from social media?
In this case, people who had posted a photo or video related to Banksy oftentimes included a hashtag, so we searched #BanksyNY and #BetterOutThanIn. When we use a hashtag, in addition to just bringing attention to a subject, we're also creating a massive online archive. Part of this project was really about accessing this archive and using it to tell a story.
What made certain users stand out?
Sometimes it was just simply the amount of accurate coverage that some people had. For example, we turned the dog-walkers into characters because they were really comprehensive. They filmed themselves looking for Banksy's pieces each day. It was examples like that that made the film really exciting, because you were watching real people documenting their experiences, not even realizing if there would be an audience for it.
Did any piece of user-generated content surprise you?
There was one moment at the end of the residency where one of the dog walkers, Kurt, was narrating how that last day went. Banksy's letter balloons were taken in front of his eyes, the cops were there and the fight broke out. Kurt was explaining this blow-by-blow for this unseen audience. At the same time, he was playing Banksy's website voiceover, which included the song "New York, New York." He said, "This is the song that he wanted us to hear at the end on this last day," and, "It's like we're in a movie." Then months later, I edited him into a movie to the same song and thought, "This actually is the end of our movie." It was a moment where the distance between those two worlds collapsed.
How do you feel about Banksy's art?
I was always interested in the amount of notoriety that Banksy was able to achieve. Whether you would even consider Banksy a contemporary artist is debatable, but personally, I was drawn to the amount of spectacle around his work. What I saw with Banksy's residency was that he is also interested in bringing light to some of that. He often makes work that isn't specifically about the gesture or the piece itself, but about the frame around it. He also seems interested in these broader themes around the gentrification of urban space and the kind of value placed on public art. I think those broader themes were attractive to me as well and were something we tried to explore with the film.
Can you speak to the monetization of Banksy's work portrayed in the film?
I think the public had these knee-jerk reactions when they realized that the Sphinx piece had been stolen in plain view. A lot of people were outraged. We connected with the men who took the piece. From their perspective, Banksy dropped this piece off in their neighborhood. It's a very charged location; there are 250 small businesses that are going to be shut down and razed to build parking and shopping for Citi Field. This area, Willets Point, is featured as a character, not only in Banksy's residency, but also in our film. These guys who had taken the Sphinx believed that because Banksy didn't report this stolen, it wasn't stolen. They said, "If we don't take it, someone else will. Some gallerist or wealthy art aficionado might take it, and what good is it going to do then? It's our neighborhood; we should be the ones to have it." Under the circumstances, it seems like a fair position for them to take.
What ignited the public interest about Banksy's residency?
I think he's arguably one of the most famous artists in the world. He's done this type of residency in the past, so he knew how it was going to play out, to some extent. I think oftentimes he was baiting the public and the media. It's interesting how much social media played into this project, and that was another component to what I think Banksy was trying to pay attention to: the fact that this is public art that exists on the street, but also the new street ? and the other public place ? is the internet.
The film ends on a sad note about 5 Pointz: what message do you hope viewers take away about street art?
What happened at 5 Pointz is complicated but it's also indicative of a larger issue: as real estate prices go up in a city like New York and as the city seems to privilege luxury condo development over businesses and cultural organizations, it changes the city's texture. As it becomes more expensive, it becomes more difficult for artists to live and work there, and the experience of living in a city changes as well. Gentrified space is not merely as diverse or vibrant as cities were in the past. There could probably never be another 5 Pointz in New York City and there's something very unfortunate about that.